Infrastructure
Dresden Bridge Collapse Sparks Repair Disputes
Nearly a year later, industry leaders warn key lessons remain unlearned.

A German construction–labour alliance says the government ignored warnings from last year’s Dresden bridge collapse and now risks diverting funds to cover budget gaps.
The Carola Bridge in Dresden collapsed on September 11, 2024, sparking debate over transport safety. Its slow demolition soon became a symbol of Germany’s sluggish infrastructure.
Attention then shifted to the bridge’s repair, but delays and political wrangling left many residents frustrated. A year later, industry leaders warn key lessons remain unlearned.
Bauindustrie, which represents medium- and large-sized contractors, has joined forces with raw materials association MIRO and trade union IG Bau to demand long-term financing and legal safeguards for a €500 billion special infrastructure fund approved earlier this year.
Peter Hübner, president of Bauindustrie, warned that money intended for infrastructure was instead being redirected to balance the books
“Let me be clear: The promised additionality of the special fund is not happening. Instead, we are seeing a diversion of investment funds from the core budget to other areas,” he said.
“Municipal coffers remain tight and too little construction continues, even to ensure local public services. Those responsible have clearly learned nothing from the Dresden bridge collapse.”
Hübner criticised the country’s slow and bureaucratic approach to construction.
“Public clients need more flexibility in awarding contracts to accommodate the diversity of different construction projects. This is the only way to use the resources of the special fund and all public investments efficiently. With less effort, less bureaucracy, and greater cost accuracy,” he added.
Concerns also extend to the supply of raw materials. MIRO president Christian Strunk pointed out that Germany consumes more than 500 million tonnes of aggregates every year.
“Germany needs over 500 million tons of aggregate every year – gravel, sand, chippings, and crushed stone. After drinking water, this is the country’s second-largest material flow. We can currently still fully supply ourselves. But more and more extraction operations are having to close due to a lack of extraction permits. Regional bottlenecks are already looming.”
Labour groups fear the situation could worsen if skilled workers are not adequately paid or protected. Carsten Burckhardt, deputy federal chairman of IG BAU, argued, “It’s not enough to approve billions if, at the same time, there is a lack of acceptance from local industry and the necessary raw materials are not approved.”
He also backed federal collective bargaining, insisting: “This should be done without any ifs and buts. For skilled workers recruited from abroad, the legislature must ensure that they are employed in companies bound by collective bargaining agreements.”
The three organisations have submitted a joint set of demands to the Bundestag, ranging from faster approval procedures to guaranteed raw material supplies and fair pay.
All three warn that without decisive action, Germany risks further structural failures like the Dresden disaster.













